Pose benchmark leaderboard

AVoptim

Calibration and trajectory refinement across four driving datasets.

Leaderboard

Calibration + trajectory refinement. Original and MOISST++ are compared across all ten pose-benchmark scores: rendering quality, structure from motion and geometric consistency.

Dataset averages over five sequences; overall averages over all twenty. Best scores in each metric are bold.
DatasetPose setNerfactoSplatfactoSfMGeometry
PSNR
dB ↑
SSIM
↑
LPIPS
↓
PSNR
dB ↑
SSIM
↑
LPIPS
↓
Reprojection
px ↓
Track length
↑
P2M precision
% ↑
Surface distance
m ↓
All datasetsMean over 20 sequencesOriginalDataset poses21.800.7200.45523.110.7720.3331.1086.1154.980.296
All datasetsMean over 20 sequencesMOISST++Calibration + trajectory22.690.7600.38725.030.8200.2660.8866.9568.740.204

Evaluation protocol

Each dataset contributes five sequences. Dataset scores come from reference/current/*_pose.csv in the benchmark repository. Overall scores are the arithmetic mean of the unrounded twenty-sequence records for each pose set.

MOISST++ refines sensor extrinsics and ego trajectory; Original is generated locally from the downloaded dataset poses. Rendering evaluation uses Nerfacto with LiDAR depth supervision and Splatfacto with SfM + LiDAR initialization, with pose optimization disabled. PSNR, SSIM and LPIPS are part of the pose benchmark.

SfM triangulates with the supplied camera poses and intrinsics fixed. P2M precision uses a 0.15 m nearest-vertex threshold; surface distance uses triangle surfaces. These scores measure consistency rather than independent absolute pose ground truth.

Paper figure